Six O’Clock Vintage

Seek those images that constitute the wild, the lion and the virgin, the harlot and the child. Find in middle air an eagle on the wing, recognize the five that make the Muses sing. | W.B Yeats, Those Images

Variations on a Theme

These are thoughts that are in progress…

After a long weekend in Chicago riding trains and being buffeted by the wind I’m back. Back at work, that is. Last night was the first time this month I’ve actually earned any money. Recently I noticed that I’ve changed a great deal. I recognize the changes easily enough for what they are externally, but I’m not absolutely certain what internal changes are going on that are more than likely responsible for my external evolution. Perhaps I need to turn out the lights, huddle in a corner, and scribbled painfully introspective poetry (so as to give free play to my embattled soul); maybe another day…

Anyhow back to the idea: I was at work, in the kitchen to be precise, and happened to reflect on the terribly unoriginal pop-song that was forcing its way through the speakers. I’m sure you’ve heard it before; maybe not the specific song, but most terribly unoriginal pop-songs sound alike—and that is where the immorality lies. Is variation on a theme a bad thing in and of itself, or is it just bad when the theme that is being varied is bad?

There are a lot of renowned classical composers who have work that sounds remarkably similar to the work of other composers, a lot of great artists find a style or theme and create pieces that cohere along the common line, even poets and writers borrow forms and stories and craft them just slightly differently under their own name. Is that wrong? Does it hinder the work from being all that it could be if it wasn’t associated with other works?

The answer, I think, is no. For similarity between one sublime thing and another is merely an illusion. Each variation on a transcendent theme is forever exploring the infinite vagaries of a divine moment; each facet of the moment beautifully different than every other facet of a moment of infinity—similarity exists only on the surface.

It is when base themes are varied in a sort of clichéd meaningless repetition that immorality rears its filthy head over and over again; indeed, exploring the intricacies of worthlessness is a dreadful enterprise.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • co.mments
  • Technorati

Activity

8 total comments, leave your comment or trackback.
  1. colleen
    May 5th 2005

    And yet so fascinating. What is it about things that frustrate and repell us…that only draw us to examine them? It’s sticky work. Someone’s got to do it. (:

    I remember you saying you like Charles Williams, yes? I just recently got around to reading Descent into Hell, and I’m enjoying it a lot! I am intent on exploring further the various works of the Inklings…including Willams. Which of his works is your favorite?
    Thanks for the recommendation, by the way. (:

  2. It is sticky work–and that is one of the worst things. It is possible to get hopelessly mired (or stuck) in the dead end of a meaningless labyrinth…

    I love every single one of the Charles Williams books that I’ve read–I’m glad you’ve taken up his work! Descent into Hell is astounding. One of my personal favorites is The Greater Trumps. They really all are favorites in one sense or another.

  3. Ariel
    May 6th 2005

    “For similarity between one sublime thing and another is merely an illusion.”

    I agree in a sense, that Creation is divinely dissimilar. An aardvark is utterly and gloriously unlike a wildebeast, and the truth carries over into non-biological realms. Seems like all the great stories are variations on common themes, however. I’m not sure there are any ultimately “new” stories to be written, for now…

  4. colleen
    May 6th 2005

    “at least for now…”
    i like that. (:

  5. In one sense every thing is, in one way or another, reverberating with one common divine theme. Everything is similar, but unique in its magnificence. God never cries encore, but repeats himself every moment.

  6. Dan Price
    May 11th 2005

    checking out that movie, looks like it will fit perfectly. Thanks.

  7. “God never cries encore, but repeats himself every moment.”

    Nicely put. He says to the sun, “Do it again!” “Do it again!” each morning.

  8. Dan Price
    May 12th 2005

    That’s from G.K. Chesterton’s “Orthodoxy”